Chegg IncCourt dismissed Chegg's antitrust suit against Google over AI Overviews using its content, leaving its traffic/revenue loss claim without legal remedy.
A US federal court has dismissed a lawsuit brought by the education technology company Chegg and Penske Media, the publisher of Rolling Stone and other US magazines, over Google's unauthorized use of their content in its artificial intelligence summary feature. In a ruling on September 30, the court said the two companies' claims that Google's business practices violate antitrust law do not hold up as a legal claim in the first place. In the lawsuit filed last year, the two companies argued that Google forces publishers to allow their content to be used in AI Overviews as a condition for continuing to appear in search results, in violation of antitrust law, and said they lost revenue as traffic to their own sites declined. The court said the plaintiffs are merely asserting that they had an expectation that if they provided content for free, Google would direct users to their sites through search, adding that an expectation is not an agreement. The court said it does not lack sympathy for the situation of publishers and online creators whose content is being repurposed by Google without payment, but that addressing the economic losses brought about by technological innovation is the prerogative of the legislature, and antitrust law does not take its place.
Chegg IncCourt dismissed Chegg's antitrust suit against Google over AI Overviews using its content, leaving its traffic/revenue loss claim without legal remedy.
Alphabet Inc Class CFederal court dismissed the antitrust lawsuit over Google's AI Overviews, removing a legal challenge to its AI summary feature and content use.
Penske Media's antitrust suit against Google over unpaid use of its content in AI summaries was dismissed by the court.